REFEREE COMMENTS SAMPLE



Referee Comments Sample

Suggestions for revising manuscripts in response to. They’re a referee. They know how to enforce the rules in an equitable way. They’re fair, they level the playing ground. They can be somewhat predictable because you know where they’re coming from, and they are not necessarily that moody. They’re good at solving problems, at creating policies. They’re good at making sure that the environment is just for all., 12.02.2013 · Consequently, editors have increased the frequency of their use of scientific referee mechanisms. For many researchers, the publication of a scientific article in a high impact factor journal is a gradual and difficult process. After preparation and submission of a manuscript, one of the most important issue is responding to the comments of.

Suggestions for revising manuscripts in response to

Authors' Responses to Referee #1 Comments. Response to referee reports We would like to thank the referees for their time and useful comments towards the improvement of our manuscript. Response to Anonymous Referee # 1 comments General comments The authors elaborate extensively on some physical mechanisms for influencing, Some of the sample feedback comments listed above are positive, but don't really give the recipient specific feedback about what actions or behaviors met your expectations and are desirable. They just communicate sentiment. Others convey expectations vaguely, using words like "dynamic" that don't necessarily have a clear or shared meaning. Make.

10.06.2009 · A content analysis of referees’ comments: how do comments on manuscripts rejected by a high-impact journal and later published in either a low- or high-impact journal differ? Authors’ Response to Referee #1 Comments Thank you for the careful review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address all the referee’s comments in the revised manuscript. Here we provide our responses to each comment as follows: Anonymous Referee #1 Received and published: 8 May 2013

Response to Referee #1 . We would like to thank the reviewer for his/her positive and insightful comments on the manuscript. Below is our response to the issues raised in the review (printed in italics). General comments: 1) This paper presents an assessment of low flow projections in Austria, putting a strongemphasis on 01.05.2009 · Most scientists learn how to review papers by being thrown into the deep end of the pool: here’s a paper, write a review. Perhaps this is not the best way to keep an enterprise afloat. But what should be included in a review? What should the tone of a review be? Here I want to outline the

They’re a referee. They know how to enforce the rules in an equitable way. They’re fair, they level the playing ground. They can be somewhat predictable because you know where they’re coming from, and they are not necessarily that moody. They’re good at solving problems, at creating policies. They’re good at making sure that the environment is just for all. How to Review a Technical Paper Alan Meier Berkeley Lab University of California Berkeley, CA 94720 USA (Received March 27, 1992) Abstract Peer review of journal articles and other technical reports is a key element in the maintenance of academic integrity. This article assists the reader in the efficient preparation of constructive reviews. The

regard to their work experience while under your supervision. Comments must be objective, and can also include specific examples to emphasise and illustrate the applicant’s abilities, knowledge, experience and personal qualities in relation to the criteria. Additional comments can be used to emphasise any strengths and weaknesses. 9 thoughts on “ How to respond to referees’ comments ” Daniel Gruner (@GrunerDaniel) February 2, 2015 at 2:24 PM. Overall I’d agree with these helpful points. It pays to be nice, and in response letters, authors should always include ALL editorial and reviewer comments in their original order, even comments that require no change or

Writing a Good Referee Report. Last updated Jul 19, 2019 0. Peer review is a crucial part of scholarly communication. During this process, authors ideally receive helpful comments on the significance and novelty of their work as well as suggestions on how to improve it. The end goal is to ensure that only high-quality research is published, and to prevent—as far as possible—the If the referee has numbered his/her comments, then give the numbers to make it clear which corrections you are referring to. If you disagree with the referee, don’t feel obliged to do what is asked. But you do need to convince the editor that the referee is incorrect. Explain yourself carefully and respectfully, and any reasonable editor will

12.02.2013 · Consequently, editors have increased the frequency of their use of scientific referee mechanisms. For many researchers, the publication of a scientific article in a high impact factor journal is a gradual and difficult process. After preparation and submission of a manuscript, one of the most important issue is responding to the comments of If the paper is not worth publishing, your referee report should provide criticisms of the paper. If you think the paper is good, in practice you suggest a “revise and resubmit” and try to offer both constructive comments to the author, and specific guidance for the editor on what needs to be done to make the paper publishable. In the “R

Writing a Good Referee Report. Last updated Jul 19, 2019 0. Peer review is a crucial part of scholarly communication. During this process, authors ideally receive helpful comments on the significance and novelty of their work as well as suggestions on how to improve it. The end goal is to ensure that only high-quality research is published, and to prevent—as far as possible—the Response to Comments of Referee 1: Wind stress curl: The dominant pattern of wind-stress curl change after the shift is indisputably the pattern shown in Figure 1a. This pattern occurs if one computes 5, 6, 10, 15, or 20 -year averages before and after the shift, and then differences them.

My experience is that usage varies. In my field, it is common to use 'referee' for the person who anonymously comments on a paper submitted to a journal, and 'reviewer' for the person who writes about a paper already published to appear publicly in a database. As a public service manager you have a responsibility to write referee reports for your staff. This can be a daunting exercise if you are unclear about what is expected. Here are some tips to help you. Details you need to know to write a referee report Staff member’s track record over time. Job profile … Continue reading Tips on writing

Writing responses to referee reports Rob J Hyndman

referee comments sample

Consistency – The Ultimate Referee The Positive. Referee Report Form. Instructions for Referees. This form may be completed in MS-Word or on a printed copy. The completed form should be provided to the applicant for review and signature prior to being forwarded to the Selection Advisory Committee for consideration in the assessment of the applicant., Authors’ Response to Referee #1 Comments Thank you for the careful review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address all the referee’s comments in the revised manuscript. Here we provide our responses to each comment as follows: Anonymous Referee #1 Received and published: 8 May 2013.

Consistency – The Ultimate Referee The Positive

referee comments sample

FREE 14+ Referee Report Forms in PDF DOC Sample Forms. Reviewer Comments to Author(s): Reviewer #1 (Jillon Vander Wal, PhD): Overall, this is a clear, concise, and well-written manuscript. The introduction is relevant and theory based. Sufficient information about the previous study findings is presented for readers to follow the present study rationale and procedures. The methods are generally https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Super_Bowl_III If the paper is not worth publishing, your referee report should provide criticisms of the paper. If you think the paper is good, in practice you suggest a “revise and resubmit” and try to offer both constructive comments to the author, and specific guidance for the editor on what needs to be done to make the paper publishable. In the “R.

referee comments sample


The following Referee Report is designed for use by referees and also by SACs when interviewing referees by phone or in a face-to-face situation. It is designed so that referee comments can easily be compared and are kept brief enough for SACs to find useful. Writing a Good Referee Report. Last updated Jul 19, 2019 0. Peer review is a crucial part of scholarly communication. During this process, authors ideally receive helpful comments on the significance and novelty of their work as well as suggestions on how to improve it. The end goal is to ensure that only high-quality research is published, and to prevent—as far as possible—the

Few Tips in Utilizing Referee Report Forms. These referee report forms are also confidential reports in which information are not to be disclosed to other people, and that only the authorized personnel could have access to these file documents. This is in order to ensure that the information of the applicant is secured and protected against Referee Report Form. Instructions for Referees. This form may be completed in MS-Word or on a printed copy. The completed form should be provided to the applicant for review and signature prior to being forwarded to the Selection Advisory Committee for consideration in the assessment of the applicant.

Neuro 204, Referee's report – Week 5, [your name here] SAMPLE 1 J. McGann et al. (2005) Odorant representations are modulated by intra- but not inter-glomerular presynaptic inhibition of olfactory sensory neurons. Neuron 48:1039-1053. A central unanswered question in olfaction research is the role of inhibition presynaptic to the regard to their work experience while under your supervision. Comments must be objective, and can also include specific examples to emphasise and illustrate the applicant’s abilities, knowledge, experience and personal qualities in relation to the criteria. Additional comments can be used to emphasise any strengths and weaknesses.

Response to Referees’ comments Timo Vihma, Olli-Pekka Mattila, Roberta Pirazzini, and Milla M. Johansson, 24 January 2011 We thank both Referees for their efforts and constructive criticism. GENERAL COMMENTS TO THE REFEREES AND EDITOR: We are very excited to have been given the opportunity to revise our manuscript, which we now entitle, “Competition and Scholarly Productivity in Management: Investigating Changes in Scholarship from 1988 to 2008,” for AMLE. We carefully considered your comments as well as those offered by the three

Sample Peer-Review of a Fictitious Manuscript Reviewer A’s Comments to Authors: This is a prospective study that analyzed the factors associated with cancer progression after EMR of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Eighty patients underwent EMR and were followed every 3 months for 1 year, and every 6 months thereafter for 3 Answer to Referee #2 We thank the Referee for raising a number of important points. We have addressed all the points raised by him/her and have marked blue the relevant corrections in the current version of the paper that have been applied to comply with his/her comments, as well as with those by Referee #1.

Referee Report Form. Instructions for Referees. This form may be completed in MS-Word or on a printed copy. The completed form should be provided to the applicant for review and signature prior to being forwarded to the Selection Advisory Committee for consideration in the assessment of the applicant. How to Write an Officiating Resumé. How to Write an Officiating Resumé . By. Referee - October 18, 2019. 8205. 0. SHARE. Facebook. Twitter. N ine times out of 10, a bad resumé will land in the “circular file” before the first half is read. Some bad resumés are just too good to throw away, though, and could end up displayed prominently in someone’s office for everyone’s amusement

Neuro 204, Referee's report – Week 5, [your name here] SAMPLE 1 J. McGann et al. (2005) Odorant representations are modulated by intra- but not inter-glomerular presynaptic inhibition of olfactory sensory neurons. Neuron 48:1039-1053. A central unanswered question in olfaction research is the role of inhibition presynaptic to the Writing a Good Referee Report. Last updated Jul 19, 2019 0. Peer review is a crucial part of scholarly communication. During this process, authors ideally receive helpful comments on the significance and novelty of their work as well as suggestions on how to improve it. The end goal is to ensure that only high-quality research is published, and to prevent—as far as possible—the

Answer to Referee #2 We thank the Referee for raising a number of important points. We have addressed all the points raised by him/her and have marked blue the relevant corrections in the current version of the paper that have been applied to comply with his/her comments, as well as with those by Referee #1. How to Write an Officiating Resumé. How to Write an Officiating Resumé . By. Referee - October 18, 2019. 8205. 0. SHARE. Facebook. Twitter. N ine times out of 10, a bad resumé will land in the “circular file” before the first half is read. Some bad resumés are just too good to throw away, though, and could end up displayed prominently in someone’s office for everyone’s amusement

Writing responses to referee reports Rob J Hyndman

referee comments sample

Response to Referees’ comments TC. If the paper is not worth publishing, your referee report should provide criticisms of the paper. If you think the paper is good, in practice you suggest a “revise and resubmit” and try to offer both constructive comments to the author, and specific guidance for the editor on what needs to be done to make the paper publishable. In the “R, The number of references may vary, however, depending on the circumstances of the applicant. For example, it’s fine for school leavers only to include one referee, and for college students to include two academic staff (teacher, lecturer or tutor) instead of one academic staff and one employer. 6. How to write references on a CV.

Writing responses to referee reports Rob J Hyndman

Referee Report Jobs ACT. Answer to Referee #2 We thank the Referee for raising a number of important points. We have addressed all the points raised by him/her and have marked blue the relevant corrections in the current version of the paper that have been applied to comply with his/her comments, as well as with those by Referee #1., The number of references may vary, however, depending on the circumstances of the applicant. For example, it’s fine for school leavers only to include one referee, and for college students to include two academic staff (teacher, lecturer or tutor) instead of one academic staff and one employer. 6. How to write references on a CV.

Answer to Referee #2 We thank the Referee for raising a number of important points. We have addressed all the points raised by him/her and have marked blue the relevant corrections in the current version of the paper that have been applied to comply with his/her comments, as well as with those by Referee #1. As a public service manager you have a responsibility to write referee reports for your staff. This can be a daunting exercise if you are unclear about what is expected. Here are some tips to help you. Details you need to know to write a referee report Staff member’s track record over time. Job profile … Continue reading Tips on writing

01.05.2009 · Most scientists learn how to review papers by being thrown into the deep end of the pool: here’s a paper, write a review. Perhaps this is not the best way to keep an enterprise afloat. But what should be included in a review? What should the tone of a review be? Here I want to outline the If the referee has numbered his/her comments, then give the numbers to make it clear which corrections you are referring to. If you disagree with the referee, don’t feel obliged to do what is asked. But you do need to convince the editor that the referee is incorrect. Explain yourself carefully and respectfully, and any reasonable editor will

Some of the sample feedback comments listed above are positive, but don't really give the recipient specific feedback about what actions or behaviors met your expectations and are desirable. They just communicate sentiment. Others convey expectations vaguely, using words like "dynamic" that don't necessarily have a clear or shared meaning. Make Reviewer Comments to Author(s): Reviewer #1 (Jillon Vander Wal, PhD): Overall, this is a clear, concise, and well-written manuscript. The introduction is relevant and theory based. Sufficient information about the previous study findings is presented for readers to follow the present study rationale and procedures. The methods are generally

referee when they send their paper to another major specialty journal. It will not go down well with that referee if they see that the authors have completely ignored the referees’ previous comments. So generally speaking, my advice is to put in the time needed to make a better paper based on the referees’ comments, and resubmit along the lines Response to referee reports We would like to thank the referees for their time and useful comments towards the improvement of our manuscript. Response to Anonymous Referee # 1 comments General comments The authors elaborate extensively on some physical mechanisms for influencing

12.02.2013 · Consequently, editors have increased the frequency of their use of scientific referee mechanisms. For many researchers, the publication of a scientific article in a high impact factor journal is a gradual and difficult process. After preparation and submission of a manuscript, one of the most important issue is responding to the comments of The most common form of letter is one that lists 2 or 3 sets of referees' comments, some of which are quite major. In such circumstances, you will need to work hard at reading and replying to each referee in turn, following the layout and 3 golden rules that I will develop later in this article.

The following Referee Report is designed for use by referees and also by SACs when interviewing referees by phone or in a face-to-face situation. It is designed so that referee comments can easily be compared and are kept brief enough for SACs to find useful. Response to Comments of Referee 1: Wind stress curl: The dominant pattern of wind-stress curl change after the shift is indisputably the pattern shown in Figure 1a. This pattern occurs if one computes 5, 6, 10, 15, or 20 -year averages before and after the shift, and then differences them.

Response to Referee #1 . We would like to thank the reviewer for his/her positive and insightful comments on the manuscript. Below is our response to the issues raised in the review (printed in italics). General comments: 1) This paper presents an assessment of low flow projections in Austria, putting a strongemphasis on The following Referee Report is designed for use by referees and also by SACs when interviewing referees by phone or in a face-to-face situation. It is designed so that referee comments can easily be compared and are kept brief enough for SACs to find useful.

regard to their work experience while under your supervision. Comments must be objective, and can also include specific examples to emphasise and illustrate the applicant’s abilities, knowledge, experience and personal qualities in relation to the criteria. Additional comments can be used to emphasise any strengths and weaknesses. 9 thoughts on “ How to respond to referees’ comments ” Daniel Gruner (@GrunerDaniel) February 2, 2015 at 2:24 PM. Overall I’d agree with these helpful points. It pays to be nice, and in response letters, authors should always include ALL editorial and reviewer comments in their original order, even comments that require no change or

Few Tips in Utilizing Referee Report Forms. These referee report forms are also confidential reports in which information are not to be disclosed to other people, and that only the authorized personnel could have access to these file documents. This is in order to ensure that the information of the applicant is secured and protected against The following Referee Report is designed for use by referees and also by SACs when interviewing referees by phone or in a face-to-face situation. It is designed so that referee comments can easily be compared and are kept brief enough for SACs to find useful.

How to choose a referee for a job. When you apply for a job, you’ll probably be asked to nominate referees. A job referee is someone your potential employer can contact to find out more about you. Your referee is someone who can tell the potential employer: what you're like as a person; what you're like to work with. Who to ask to be a referee As a public service manager you have a responsibility to write referee reports for your staff. This can be a daunting exercise if you are unclear about what is expected. Here are some tips to help you. Details you need to know to write a referee report Staff member’s track record over time. Job profile … Continue reading Tips on writing

Response to Comments of Referee 1: Wind stress curl: The dominant pattern of wind-stress curl change after the shift is indisputably the pattern shown in Figure 1a. This pattern occurs if one computes 5, 6, 10, 15, or 20 -year averages before and after the shift, and then differences them. comments are organized along thematic lincs. Specific comments follow the order of the text in the paper. pcintng out things that I didn’t understand. inaccuracies, misspc1!c words, clumsy wording. etc. If you have caustic comments to make, put them in a cover lcctcr c in a separate section so

The following are examples of reviews rated by Deputy Editors of JGIM. The reviews are rated on the following scale: 6=outstanding, 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor. The number of references may vary, however, depending on the circumstances of the applicant. For example, it’s fine for school leavers only to include one referee, and for college students to include two academic staff (teacher, lecturer or tutor) instead of one academic staff and one employer. 6. How to write references on a CV

-Physical contact with a referee , not in the context of a training environment - Inappropriate or disproportionate e‐mail or phone contact with an individual referee -Inappropriate or disproportionate text messaging of an individual referee - Facebook & Twitter ‐ messaging or posting of inappropriate/ excessive comments or photos. 12.02.2013 · Consequently, editors have increased the frequency of their use of scientific referee mechanisms. For many researchers, the publication of a scientific article in a high impact factor journal is a gradual and difficult process. After preparation and submission of a manuscript, one of the most important issue is responding to the comments of

Authors’ Response to Referee #1 Comments Thank you for the careful review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address all the referee’s comments in the revised manuscript. Here we provide our responses to each comment as follows: Anonymous Referee #1 Received and published: 8 May 2013 referee when they send their paper to another major specialty journal. It will not go down well with that referee if they see that the authors have completely ignored the referees’ previous comments. So generally speaking, my advice is to put in the time needed to make a better paper based on the referees’ comments, and resubmit along the lines

A content analysis of referees’ comments how do comments

referee comments sample

Response to Referees’ comments TC. As a public service manager you have a responsibility to write referee reports for your staff. This can be a daunting exercise if you are unclear about what is expected. Here are some tips to help you. Details you need to know to write a referee report Staff member’s track record over time. Job profile … Continue reading Tips on writing, referee when they send their paper to another major specialty journal. It will not go down well with that referee if they see that the authors have completely ignored the referees’ previous comments. So generally speaking, my advice is to put in the time needed to make a better paper based on the referees’ comments, and resubmit along the lines.

References on a CV benefits format and referee examples. My experience is that usage varies. In my field, it is common to use 'referee' for the person who anonymously comments on a paper submitted to a journal, and 'reviewer' for the person who writes about a paper already published to appear publicly in a database., This is an evaluation performance form for referees. This referee evaluation form is useful for any senior management or coordinator. This referee form template has evaluators' name, evaluators' email, referee name, date and game time, competition level..

How to reply to referees v.7 tracks off JAAD

referee comments sample

REFEREE REPORT KIT Department of Infrastructure. regard to their work experience while under your supervision. Comments must be objective, and can also include specific examples to emphasise and illustrate the applicant’s abilities, knowledge, experience and personal qualities in relation to the criteria. Additional comments can be used to emphasise any strengths and weaknesses. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neutron-acceptance_diagram_shading Reviewer Comments to Author(s): Reviewer #1 (Jillon Vander Wal, PhD): Overall, this is a clear, concise, and well-written manuscript. The introduction is relevant and theory based. Sufficient information about the previous study findings is presented for readers to follow the present study rationale and procedures. The methods are generally.

referee comments sample


Suggestions for revising manuscripts in response to referee comments. Matt Ayres, 29 Aug 2006 (13 Jan 2008, 27 Sept 2017) Revising manuscripts in response to referee critiques is an important part of the process that seldom gets taught. As an editor, I have seen … regard to their work experience while under your supervision. Comments must be objective, and can also include specific examples to emphasise and illustrate the applicant’s abilities, knowledge, experience and personal qualities in relation to the criteria. Additional comments can be used to emphasise any strengths and weaknesses.

Referee Report Form. Instructions for Referees. This form may be completed in MS-Word or on a printed copy. The completed form should be provided to the applicant for review and signature prior to being forwarded to the Selection Advisory Committee for consideration in the assessment of the applicant. Writing a Good Referee Report. Last updated Jul 19, 2019 0. Peer review is a crucial part of scholarly communication. During this process, authors ideally receive helpful comments on the significance and novelty of their work as well as suggestions on how to improve it. The end goal is to ensure that only high-quality research is published, and to prevent—as far as possible—the

Sample Peer-Review of a Fictitious Manuscript Reviewer A’s Comments to Authors: This is a prospective study that analyzed the factors associated with cancer progression after EMR of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Eighty patients underwent EMR and were followed every 3 months for 1 year, and every 6 months thereafter for 3 9 thoughts on “ How to respond to referees’ comments ” Daniel Gruner (@GrunerDaniel) February 2, 2015 at 2:24 PM. Overall I’d agree with these helpful points. It pays to be nice, and in response letters, authors should always include ALL editorial and reviewer comments in their original order, even comments that require no change or

Sample Peer-Review of a Fictitious Manuscript Reviewer A’s Comments to Authors: This is a prospective study that analyzed the factors associated with cancer progression after EMR of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Eighty patients underwent EMR and were followed every 3 months for 1 year, and every 6 months thereafter for 3 My experience is that usage varies. In my field, it is common to use 'referee' for the person who anonymously comments on a paper submitted to a journal, and 'reviewer' for the person who writes about a paper already published to appear publicly in a database.

Reply to comments of Anonymous Referee #1 RESPONSE: We thank anonymous referee #1 for evaluating and reviewing our manuscript. We are especially grateful for the many constructive comments and suggestions and we have to the best of our abilities responded to them. We address the referee’s comments in the following point by point response. Answer to Referee #2 We thank the Referee for raising a number of important points. We have addressed all the points raised by him/her and have marked blue the relevant corrections in the current version of the paper that have been applied to comply with his/her comments, as well as with those by Referee #1.

Few Tips in Utilizing Referee Report Forms. These referee report forms are also confidential reports in which information are not to be disclosed to other people, and that only the authorized personnel could have access to these file documents. This is in order to ensure that the information of the applicant is secured and protected against The following Referee Report is designed for use by referees and also by SACs when interviewing referees by phone or in a face-to-face situation. It is designed so that referee comments can easily be compared and are kept brief enough for SACs to find useful.

regard to their work experience while under your supervision. Comments must be objective, and can also include specific examples to emphasise and illustrate the applicant’s abilities, knowledge, experience and personal qualities in relation to the criteria. Additional comments can be used to emphasise any strengths and weaknesses. Response to referee reports We would like to thank the referees for their time and useful comments towards the improvement of our manuscript. Response to Anonymous Referee # 1 comments General comments The authors elaborate extensively on some physical mechanisms for influencing

referee when they send their paper to another major specialty journal. It will not go down well with that referee if they see that the authors have completely ignored the referees’ previous comments. So generally speaking, my advice is to put in the time needed to make a better paper based on the referees’ comments, and resubmit along the lines Keywords: Referee report, Cover letter, Ethics, Conflicts of Interest. February 17, 2015. Please send correspondence to cam.harvey@duke.edu. This document has benefited from the thoughtful comments of many people and, especially, John Cochrane and Ivo Welch.

Answer to Referee #2 We thank the Referee for raising a number of important points. We have addressed all the points raised by him/her and have marked blue the relevant corrections in the current version of the paper that have been applied to comply with his/her comments, as well as with those by Referee #1. Response to Referee #1 . We would like to thank the reviewer for his/her positive and insightful comments on the manuscript. Below is our response to the issues raised in the review (printed in italics). General comments: 1) This paper presents an assessment of low flow projections in Austria, putting a strongemphasis on

How to Review a Technical Paper Alan Meier Berkeley Lab University of California Berkeley, CA 94720 USA (Received March 27, 1992) Abstract Peer review of journal articles and other technical reports is a key element in the maintenance of academic integrity. This article assists the reader in the efficient preparation of constructive reviews. The If the referee has numbered his/her comments, then give the numbers to make it clear which corrections you are referring to. If you disagree with the referee, don’t feel obliged to do what is asked. But you do need to convince the editor that the referee is incorrect. Explain yourself carefully and respectfully, and any reasonable editor will

Sample Peer-Review of a Fictitious Manuscript Reviewer A’s Comments to Authors: This is a prospective study that analyzed the factors associated with cancer progression after EMR of Barrett’s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. Eighty patients underwent EMR and were followed every 3 months for 1 year, and every 6 months thereafter for 3 As a public service manager you have a responsibility to write referee reports for your staff. This can be a daunting exercise if you are unclear about what is expected. Here are some tips to help you. Details you need to know to write a referee report Staff member’s track record over time. Job profile … Continue reading Tips on writing

17.10.2013 · Responding to peer reviewers’ comments becomes an overwhelming task for most authors. However, following certain guidelines will make it easy for authors to deal with reviewer comments. This post provides simple guidelines and expert tips for responding to reviewer comments. -Physical contact with a referee , not in the context of a training environment - Inappropriate or disproportionate e‐mail or phone contact with an individual referee -Inappropriate or disproportionate text messaging of an individual referee - Facebook & Twitter ‐ messaging or posting of inappropriate/ excessive comments or photos.

Writing a Good Referee Report. Last updated Jul 19, 2019 0. Peer review is a crucial part of scholarly communication. During this process, authors ideally receive helpful comments on the significance and novelty of their work as well as suggestions on how to improve it. The end goal is to ensure that only high-quality research is published, and to prevent—as far as possible—the Authors’ Response to Referee #1 Comments Thank you for the careful review and valuable comments on our manuscript. We address all the referee’s comments in the revised manuscript. Here we provide our responses to each comment as follows: Anonymous Referee #1 Received and published: 8 May 2013